Stranded activity

Would there be any laws to control how you consistd, what obligation or freedoms you exercised, or what property you had? Why? in that respect would crap to be certain moral laws as to how to live on the Island. The majority of laws should still pertain despite the situation. No murder or stealing should unquestionably still apply. Freedoms and Rights should be very close to the U. S. G everywherenment as far as the freedom of speech, and religion. As far as property and the rights to own the property, there should be an agreement as to which property separately errors owns and that what was built or created by that person is their property.These would be peachy laws to control how citizens live in a realistic way which would help arguments and discrimination in these areas. Realistically these laws would be broken though. Despite the accompaniment that the majority of raft do want to be civil and take a shit an agreement on how to cut through and avoid issues, without an actual rankment it would be chaos. Government provides rules and breaking them results in consequences, with no rules or consequences to actions, It makes it come out okay. It Is Important to establish laws and consequences of breaking them. ) Considering the key terms from this unit, what type or form of presidential term would be best suited for your situation? Why? In this situation of being stranded, a Direct body politic would be the best government in order for citizens to collectively vote and agree on problems. There still needs to be a government to keep everything together so an anarchy would non be a good idea. An Autocracy would be a bad idea as thoroughlyspring because with one person governing there would be no regard to others assents.With a Direct res publica everyone has the ability to state their opinion without It being unfair or unreasonable because they all voted. 3) Would anyone have the right to govern you? Would you have the right to govern anyone el se? Why? I believe if it was a mutual congregation decision on the issue then the group as a whole has the right to govern that person. I dont believe one person should be able to govern because that is Just one persons opinion and it is a biased decision.In the aspire democracy that I believe the citizens on the stranded island should have, it would be more reasonable to have the group govern. In order to have a working and stable environs governing others is necessary but with fairness. 4) Would you have any rights? What might these rights be? Yes, I would have rights because everyone deserves to have them. Rights such as the right to build a home, rights to hunt and gather food as well as rights to vote for how 5)What might people who were stronger or smarter than others try to do? Why?The stronger or smarter people might try to create a dictatorship in order to have intro over others and to govern them for their own personal reasons. They might also try to effect the idea th at everyone is equal and just about citizens whitethorn be treated poorly and have their rights taken away. Rights such as owning property, and voting may be taken away. 6) What might the weaker or less worldly or wise try to do? Why? The weaker and less worldly would most likely give in to the opinions of others. In a direct democracy they might let others influence their votes in order to try to keep the peace.This is a good reason why it should not be a one man Job to govern, because the weaker may have trouble stating their own opinions. 7) What might life be like for everyone? Life for everyone no matter how their government is run would be hard. Not everyone is going to be happy with the decisions that the government leave behind come to and that will always create conflict among the citizens. Learning how to fend on the island while still following the laws and moral philosophy would be difficult and in the situation many not obey these rules.